Sunday, October 19, 2014

Can A Saved Man Choose Not To Be Saved?

To me I see in the world today in 2014 millions of people that believe that God opens the door for only a "once-in-a-lifetime" decision and then closes that door forever. It is as though God says,

"I'm going to give you only one decision about changing over from your doomed condition. Once you decide to be saved you can never choose to be lost again. When you accept Jesus as your Savior, it will be the final choice you will ever make about your eternal destiny. If you change your mind later it will be too late, you are still Saved. No matter how deeply and sincerely you desire to be lost and repent of your repentance, you cannot escape from eternal life. No amount of bitter rebellion, deliberate blasphemy, or evil living can change that once-for-all decision to be saved. I will not allow you any further choice after you accept Jesus as your Saviour." 

To be honest basically, this is the belief of a large amount of Christians who advocate the doctrine of eternal security. Another equally sincere group of Christians believes that God leaves the door open for us to change our minds at any time. They believe that salvation is not predicated upon only one irrevocable act or choice of the past, but upon a continuous, personal relationship of the believer with Christ. When the decision to break the love-relationship is made by willful disobedience, the believer ceases to be a true believer and forfeits any assurance of salvation. The implications of this issue are overwhelming if you think about it. If there is an unconditional future security for all believers, it has to be the most wonderful doctrine in existence, but if it is not true, it surely is one of the most dangerous heresies in the world right?

Millions could be saved or lost over the decision they make on this one point alone!.....crazy to think about. Ok lets take keeping the Sabbath day holy since I’m a Sabbath keeper myself. Say a large group of people were completely convinced that Saturday is the true Sabbath of the Scriptures….but of those people only a very few made any decision to obey the truth. Practically all of them had Sabbath problems connected with their jobs. It would have meant inconvenience, economic hardship, and possible loss of employment for them to follow the truth all the way. Each one who rejected the message said….."We are already saved," and" we cannot be lost. Why should we run the risk of losing our jobs by keeping the Sabbath? We would not be any more saved by keeping the Sabbath than we are right now, and we certainly cannot be lost by breaking the Sabbath."  See how their argument was consistent with their doctrine? To them salvation was not connected with obedience, or advancing in spiritual growth. It all focused on a past moment when they made a decision for Christ. They could break the 4th commandment, the 7th commandment, the 10th, or all of them, and still feel eternally secure in the promise they had claimed "when they were saved." 

To be sure, these people believed that their disobedience might affect the joy and peace of their relationship, but never the assurance of ultimate salvation. Ok with this topic on being saved we need to answer some questions….Can we change our minds about being saved? Do we give up our power of choice when we are converted? Does salvation consist of one grand, holy moment of decision, or must we continue in the saving grace of Christ after that decision? Can God take defiling sins into His holy kingdom?Let’s go to the Bible again shall we!! Like if I was going to go to some other source on this topic haha :-)  

If a person does not abide in Christ, he withers, dies, and finally experiences the final death that Christ talks about. This proves that the relation of a believer to Christ is never a static thing based only on a past experience. We are supposed to have relationship with Christ everyday, it's a relationship issue. It is a current, mutual sharing of a common life which is drawn from Him "who is our life" (Colossians 3:4). When the branch is separated from the vine, the source of life is gone, and only death can result. These words of Jesus are too clear to be misconstrued. Even believing and trusting Christians who are connected to the living vine may choose to separate from the vine. When they do, they die. Nothing can wither and die that has not previously been alive. Security is eternal life only for those whose faith is eternally fixed on Jesus, and whose life is connected to the one who is our life. 

Obviously we can choose to be lost no matter how saved we once were. Everything depends on maintaining the divine connection with the true vine. Jesus taught the same truth about losing eternal life in the parable of the sower. In explaining the seed which fell among the thorns and the rocks, Jesus said, "Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved. They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away." Luke 8:12, 13

There are things to notice in this parable. First, only one class will finally be saved…..the ones who brought forth much fruit. The groups represented by the wayside and rocks will not be saved. In verse 12, the wayside hearers did not have a chance to "believe and be saved," but in the next verse the stony ground hearers do "for a while believe." What kind of "believing" is this? According to verse 12, it is the kind that saves. So the ones who believed for a while were saved for a while, but in time of temptation they fell away. Eventually they were lost along with all the others except the fruit bearers. I think this is an awesome example teaching of our Lord that people can have a saving faith for a while, and yet lose it and be lost. So does the bible talk about eternal security? Yes! 

In Luke 12:42-46 Christ described in another parable how a faithful servant could turn into an unfaithful one. After asking, "Who then is that faithful and wise steward, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household . . . ?" Jesus answers His own question: "That servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing . . . he will make him ruler over all that he hath." Then Christ explains how that servant could lose his reward. "But and if that servant say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants and maidens, and to eat and drink, and to be drunken; The lord of that servant will come in a day when he looketh not for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with the unbelievers." Verses 45, 46. Here is a perfect example I think by Jesus. Jesus was talking about a man whom He had seen faithful enough to trust with heavy responsibilities. This servant represents those who carefully served the Lord as true believers. But what happened? That very faithful servant departed from the path of faithfulness and reaped eternal ruin and death. Does this not also remind us of Hebrews 10:38, "Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him." The servant in the parable, who was a believer, is now punished with the unbelievers. The faithful can draw back to perdition. 

Ok one more parable of Christ highlights the fact that continued forgiveness is conditional for the believer. This is in Matthew 18:21-35, and revolves around the forgiveness of God. A king responded to the pleas of his servant and forgave him a large debt. That servant went out and found a fellow servant who owed him a small amount and showed no mercy, throwing him in prison because he could not pay. When the king heard what had happened, he rescinded his cancellation of the large debt and had his servant thrown to the tormentors till he paid in full. No one can deny the obvious teaching of this parable. Even though God graciously forgives those who apply for it, that forgiveness is not without conditions for the future…..this is key to understand. We can lose that forgiveness by being unmerciful to others. We have to ask for forgiveness with each new sin or wrong deed we do. But once we ask for forgiveness for that one sin or wrong deed, then we don't have to ask for forgiveness for that same one sin or wrong deed again....the Devil will try to make us think that we have to keep asking forgiveness for the same sin over and over but that's not true. 

This is in harmony with the words of Jesus in Ezekiel 33:13, "When I shall say to the righteous, that he shall surely live; if he trust to his own righteousness, and commit iniquity, all his righteousnesses shall not be remembered; but for his iniquity that he hath committed, he shall die for it." The principle is repeated in verse 18, "When the righteous turned from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, he shall even die thereby." The secret lies in maintaining the righteous relationship with the source of salvation. Jesus said, "He that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved." Matthew 24:13. Those who do not endure to the end will have their names blotted out of the book of life. Many I think deny it could ever happen, but read the possibility for yourself in Revelation 3:5, "He that overcometh . . . I will not blot out his name out of the book of life." The implication is clear that those who are not overcomers who do not endure to the end will have their names blotted out. 

Look at all of the following verses…..There is an eternal "if" in every consideration of eternal security. "If we walk in the light . . . the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin." 1 John 1:7. "If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father." 1 John 2:24. "If any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him." Hebrews 10:38. "If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch." John 15:6. "If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death." John 8:51. "If thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off." Romans 11:22. "If ye do these things, ye shall never fall." 2 Peter 1:10. "For we are made partakers of Christ, If we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto the end." Hebrews 3:14. "If we endure, we shall also reign with him: If we deny him, he also will deny us." 2 Timothy 2:12. "If we sin willfully . . . there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins." Hebrews 10:26. "If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." 1 John 2:15. "Ye are my friends, If ye do whatsoever I command you." John 15:14. "If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die." Romans 8:13. 

In Romans Chapter 11 Paul is discussing the fact that many of the physical seed of Israel rejected God's Son and were then cut off. The illustration is used of an olive tree. The branches were the children of Israel, but because of their unbelief, they were broken off or cut off. Then, some wild olive branches were grafted in, which represents the Gentile Christians.  Note this though…."For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, IF THOU CONTINUE IN HIS GOODNESS: OTHERWISE, THOU ALSO SHALT BE CUT OFF." Verses 21 and 22, note that any security for those branches depended entirely upon their connection with the tree. The security was conditional. Even Peter agrees Paul. In 2 Peter, chapter 1.  There are listed a number of virtues which should be manifested in the life of every Christian. These are mentioned in verses 5-7, and notice that he is writing to "them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ." Verse 1. Then they had been given "all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue." Verse 3. It is very apparent that Peter is addressing these remarks to those who have been converted. 

But notice the warning he gives: "But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins. Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall." Verses 9 and 10. Surely this indicates that Christians can fall from grace. They can turn back from following Jesus. They can even become apostates in the truest sense of the word. In the third chapter, Peter goes on to say, "Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless." Verse 14. "Seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own steadfastness." Verse 17. So we see that Peter does agree with Paul that Christians need to be on guard constantly lest they be led astray, and he indicates the sad fate of those who turn back into sin after they are converted. 

One of the strongest texts to me in the Bible that proves a person can turn away from Christ and be lost even after he has made a profession of being saved is 2 Peter 2:20-22: "If after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire." 

Now how awesome is that!! Huge evidence here!! Now, those who take a position for unconditional security say that God's sons cannot be represented by dogs and sows. Well, maybe they can't, but Peter did and it is the greatest of illustrations. The proverb is painfully plain really when you read it a few times I think. They had escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. They had been converted. They had joined Christ on His side. They had turned their lives over to Him, but they remembered the world and the "wallow" of sin. Like the Israelites coming out of Egypt, they remembered the "flesh pots," the "leeks and onions." They remembered the pleasures of sin; so, leaving Christ they went back into the world like the hog returns to its wallow in the mire. 

Certainly no Christian should imitate the habits of a hog, but Peter's proverb shows that it is possible. The Spirit of God is not silent on this point.  "Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times SOME SHALL DEPART FROM THE FAITH, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils." 1 Timothy 4:1, When will this happen? When will some depart from the faith? In the latter times…..That would be right now, wouldn't it? More signs of the end here in 2014? That would be the times in which we are living today right? Of course it would. On this point "the Spirit speaketh expressly." Just what does that mean? It means the Spirit speaks plainly, clearly - so clearly it is impossible to misunderstand. All right then, what would some do? Some would depart from the faith. So, it is possible to leave the faith, isn't it? Some do it even today. They have been in the faith, they have worshiped with their brothers, they have attended church and prayer meeting/Bible studies. They have been actively promoting the gospel, they have given of their means, they have been pastors, officers of the church, and leading laymen, they once had a strong relationship with Christ, they understand that salvation is a free gift from God, not of works, and that Christ is the way, the truth, and the key to getting eternal life.....to love Christ and accept Him as your Savior. But then nevertheless, they still leave the faith. They are not steadfast and faithful. 

In the last days there will come perilous times, with persecutions and serious difficulties, and some do not stand as told in the books of Daniel and Revelation if you study end time events. If you ever want to study end time events with me or any topic I’m open, just ask me :-). They are tempted by the things of the world and are seduced by spirits of devils. Sad to say, they give up their allegiance to Jesus. They were on Christ's side, but now they side with His enemy which is Satan following the world and what the world says. There will also be people who join Christ’s side in the end as well as stated in Revelation chapter 18. Revelation 18 states that so many will come to the true church of Christ, which is the Sabbath keeping church....most likely SDA church's since they preach the truth of the Bible, that they won't be able to close there doors.

Ok please don't misunderstand….If you want unconditional security, you can have it. It is in Christ which Christ clearly offers on a day-by-day, moment-by-moment basis. When you take Christ and stay by Him, you will persevere. You will know that your salvation is sure. There is, and can be, no failure on Christ's part. He will not fail; He is faithful. "Cast thy burden upon the Lord, and he shall sustain thee." Psalm 55:22. He will stand by you as long as you stand by Him. Jesus said of Himself, "I am the way, the truth, and the life." John 14:6. And John wrote of the Lord, "This is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life." 1 John 5:11, 12.

Even many non-Christians think they have security. They will tell you they believe God and God will admit them to heaven. They will say, "I am as good as people in the church," or "I feel I will be saved without going to church” or “I don’t need to be with or spend time with God’s people worshiping in a church”, but the truth is, no man is saved on the basis of his feelings. He may be sincere, but his sincerity will not save him. He may be honest, truthful, moral, and a first class citizen, but that won't save him. He may even be a supporter of the church and a giver to the needy, but neither will that save him. No man is saved by his works, good as they may be. Works do have a part to play and we are judged by our works in other ways, but not to get to heaven.
 
Remember this….Christ is the Savior, not your gifts, not your works. He offers you salvation as a free gift. It is in Christ, and when you receive Christ, you have salvation. "He that hath the Son, hath life." 1 John 5:12. But if you don't have the Son, you don't have life, and you cannot have eternal security until you have and keep Christ the Son. Jesus said, "I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand." John 10:28, 29.  

What a tremendous promise this should be for every trusting child of God! At first glance, it does seem to guarantee some sort of immunity against spiritual loss, but verse 27 is a part of the thought, and it lays down a specific condition for the fulfillment of the promise in verses 28 and 29. "My sheep hear my voice and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life." Please notice that it is only God's true followers who nestle safely in His protecting hand. He gives eternal life only to the faithful sheep who hear and follow Him. It is this hearing and following which provides immunity against being plucked away by the devil or his angels/demons. The protection is from enemies who seek to carry off the sheep, but not from unfaithfulness of the sheep who might choose not to follow any longer. No one can pluck them out of the Father's hand, but they may choose to jump out at any time. This is key to understand. 

Remember, God never even hints that He will interfere with the freedom of choice of His followers. Christians can choose to be lost just as much as sinners can choose to be saved. Just think how useless all the hundreds of biblical warnings against apostasy would be if it were impossible to experience it. Why would the Spirit have led Paul, Peter, and all the others to pen such huge threats against eternal loss in the Bible if they were in no danger of suffering it? And if it is true that the "once saved" are eternally secure, surely the devil would know about it. Therefore, he would never waste any time on believers, knowing how impossible it would be to cause them to be lost. Yet, we all know by experience that Satan works even harder to pull away the saints from following Christ.

So with all this Biblical evidence we have to conclude that salvation does not consist of a single, irrevocable commitment, whether past or present. Being saved is the experience of living Christ's own life by divine impartation. It is never a reality except in continual, dynamic relationship with Jesus, the source of eternal life. Being saved must be spoken of in all three tenses of time in order to be completely biblical. It has happened, it is happening, and it will happen. 

Ok here is an example I found online and I wanted to add it to my study on this topic. This guy Bill Jones is fishing several miles out in the ocean. His boat capsizes and sinks to the bottom. He is unable to swim to safety. Just then, another fishing boat comes along, but it is so heavily loaded that it is impossible to take on another passenger. Because they want to rescue the doomed man, however, the crew throws him a rope. "Here, take this rope," they say. "We will tow you to shore." As he takes the rope, Bill Jones says, "Thank God, I am saved!" And he is saved, as long as he holds on to the rope. Salvation is his, but he has a part to play in it. If he should at any time release his grasp on the rope and refuse to take it again, he would be lost. So it is also true with a person who has been rescued from sin. He remains saved as long as he holds on to the hand of Christ. If he should decide to release that hand and clasp the hand of the devil, he would be lost. His salvation depends on his decisions and his actions of both his body and mind to choose Christ. To have your actions (fruits) match up with your words. Faith plus works go together. One can properly speak of salvation in three tenses - past, present, and future. He can say, "I have been saved" when he takes the rope, "I am being saved" as he is being towed to shore; and "I shall be saved" when he plants his feet firmly on shore. 

A converted person -has been saved- from the penalty of sin. We call that justification. He -is being saved- from the power of sin, and we call that sanctification. He -shall be saved- from the presence of sin when Christ comes, and that will be glorification. All three of these tenses are used in the Bible in connection with being saved. 

In Romans 8:24 is the expression, "We are saved by hope." In another translation He says, "We have been saved," past tense. The Corinthians 1:18 as "To us who are being saved." Then Acts 15:11 states, "that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved." So you see past, present, and future
. Does the fact that he must cling to the rope to be saved, mean that we can earn our salvation by our own works? Absolutely not! Remember that he was being towed by a power other than his own. He was merely cooperating with that power. He was holding on to the rope. He had to do that in order to be pulled to safety. As Christians we must confess our faith in Christ, we must remain steadfast to Him, we must bring forth the fruits of obedience; that is our part in holding on to Christ. He will never let us go. The only way we can separate ourselves from Him is to cut ourselves off deliberately and disconnect ourselves from Him, but we as humans who have free choice do have the power to do that. We are still free moral agents. Never forget that. 

Our will has not been removed merely because we have become Christians. At any point in our Christian life we can decide to turn back, to choose the things of the world rather than the things of God and heaven. We are saved only through faith in Jesus Christ as our Savior. "There is no other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Acts 4:12. However, we show our faith by our works. It is a manifestation of our love for Him. Keeping God's commandments and doing right are merely the result of His Holy Spirit dwelling in the heart. These are the fruits of the Spirit. We do these things, not in order to be saved, but because we are saved, and as long as we love the Lord with all our heart, all our mind, all our soul. Also that we are going to be obedient to Him, and we will not let go of the rope. We will continue to cling to Christ as our only hope. 

There is no question that the popular modern theology today has been teaching millions of people that no one can really live without sinning. The Ten Commandments have been portrayed as an idealistic code produced only for the purpose of making people conscious of their need. Many modern Christians are turning more and more to a soft, lenient stance on the subject of law-keeping (Teaching as I like to call the Law...it's a better way to put it). They believe God’s love is incompatible with strict rules and penalties for violation….don’t fall for this lie that the devil has put into place for the whole world to follow. This is a very comfortable doctrine but completely foreign to what the Bible teaches. Again, millions of people are being conditioned to break the great moral law of the universe without feeling any guilt at all!! How messed up is that!!

The Word of God gives no one an excuse to feel relaxed about sin. It is the central problem of every person who has been born and ever will be born until the end of time. Like a highly contagious disease, sin has infected every soul with the germs of death, and no earthly cure has been found to halt the fatal progress of the sickness. Accepting and believing in Christ is our only hope against sin...that is just the simple facts. From the first appearance of sin in the Garden of Eden it has been totally disruptive of everything good. Never in one instance has it been able to coexist with righteousness. The requirements of God make it utterly impossible for sin or disobedience to be a part of the Christian lifestyle. This new worldly taught tolerance for it is not biblical in any sense of the word. Jesus came to save people from it, He came to destroy it. It will never enter into heaven. Our attitude toward it must be uncompromising. There can be no question of making it more acceptable by diminishing the amount of it or changing its form. It must be destroyed. Again, the only means of eradicating it is by receiving the fullness of Jesus Christ and His grace into the life. How strange it is that so many church members have now become apologetic for sin, as though it cannot be prevented from triumphing in the life of a Christian

How dare we misrepresent the power of God’s grace in the gospel! Jesus has already defeated the devil, and no Christian should be intimidated by an inferior, defeated foe like the devil. I mean do you agree with this? We have no business justifying the transgression of the Ten Commandments. To me it is serious enough to engage willfully in an act of sin, but it is infinitely more deadly to defend it as something which cannot be prevented. To say that victory is impossible is to deny the purity and truth of the gospel and to negate a large portion of the inspired Scriptures.  It also adds support to the original charge of Satan against God, and gives a paralyzing, false security to everyone who believes in it. 
Often people are defensive of sin because they have not been able to stop doing it in their own strength. 

For example, when they can’t stop smoking, they must find a rationalization for its presence in their lives. Instead of making the humiliating confession that they can’t conquer it, they fabricate arguments that it really doesn't hurt them or that no one can be perfect…..or the popular doctrine that no one can really live without sin anyway. It is probably safe to say that the majority of Christians today are resigned to falling short of the moral law. In fact, they are quite satisfied that God doesn't even expect them to fulfill that law completely, either in the flesh or in the spirit. This is such a lie by the enemy. The effect of such a teaching is exactly what one would expect….tons and tons of emotionally happy, but disobedient church members who feel that any concern about keeping the commandments is nitpicking and legalistic. What a delusive strategy of Satan!...and it's working very well as most people have this mind set. 

As the inventor of the doctrine, the evil one is simply supporting his ancient accusation that God was asking too much when he was in heaven in the beginning. He accused God of being unfair by requiring something that was impossible. He was able to convince a third of the angels that God was unreasonable to expect obedience to His law, and he has been trying to make everybody else believe it since that time....of course this attack still goes on today in 2014. 

Think about it for a moment, and the entire scheme begins to make a lot of diabolical sense, at least to me. Satan knows that sin is the only thing that will keep anyone out of heaven. Since sin is the “transgression of the law,” he had to perfect a plan to make people look lightly upon breaking the law and also cause it to appear unobjectionable (1 John 3:4). To make the idea acceptable to Christians, Satan actually was able to disguise it as a doctrine and pass it off upon a compromised Christianity. In every evangelistic crusade we meet it in one form or another, usually at the point of the law and the Sabbath. Trust me since I’m a Sabbath keeper I know this and see it first hand all the time haha. The inconvenient claims of obedience are shrugged off with a “Well, nobody can keep the Ten Commandments anyway.” But you see the problem doesn't even end there. Even Christians who have accepted the claims of the moral law are not too concerned about how well they fulfill it either. In a subtle way they have been affected by the prevalent belief that too much concern about obedience is a form of salvation by works. Some people seem to be so fearful of keeping the law too closely that they actually make provision to break it, and by doing so they comfort themselves for not being legalistic. I mean it’s a horrible and twisted way to think….it’s sad and it really makes me hate the devil for what he has done since the beginning of time. People need to know the truth and/or search for the truth themselves and make themselves open. 

How could people committed to commandment keeping ever come to such a confused contradiction within themselves? Exposure to a false concept of righteousness by faith is only part of the answer in my opinion. Much of the problem is based upon human failure and weakness of the flesh. Because people find themselves stumbling in their efforts to be perfect they finally concluded that it was impossible not to sin. From that point it was easy to start interpreting Bible texts to support their weak experience. Satan exploited the psychological bent of the human mind to rationalize, and soon they had developed a comfortable doctrine that accommodated their occasional deviations from the law. 

Most Christians today are resigned to an alternating experience of victory-defeat, victory-defeat. To them it is the approved lifestyle of normal Christianity. In the first place doctrine should never be based on feeling or human experience. It must be rooted in the plain teaching of the Word of God and for what it says for face value. It is true that Bible texts can be assembled which seem to support the doctrine of spiritual imperfection. We are assured that all have sinned, that the carnal mind is against God, and that man’s righteousness is as filthy rags. But all the verses about failure, sin, and defeat are in reference to the unregenerate experience of a person. There are tons of other texts which describe an opposite experience of total victory and sinless living. In every case they are referring to the Spirit-filled life of a converted and committed child of God. This distinction must always be recognized in the reading of the Bible. The gospel of Jesus is the power of God unto salvation. His grace is stronger than all the concentrated forces of evil put together. Jesus came to save His people from their sin. No one who reads Romans chapter 6 intelligently can believe that the Christian is free to practice sin. Paul is against the doctrine that a believer should keep on falling into the same sin over and over and over again. It is true that provision is made for cleansing in case sin is committed, but God’s perfect plan made it possible for man to overcome every sin they face and to live a life of perfect obedience through Christ. I'm not saying it's not hard and not saying that we won't sin again while we live on this earth, but we can defeat sins in our lives and not do those same sins again.

The promises of the Bible are so clear and specific on this point that it is hard to get confused when studying this. No secret meaning can be found in the texts which describe the victorious experience of the born-again child of God. Just because one may not have grown into that fullness of faith which brings constant victory, he should not, therefore, deny the power of God to give such deliverance. When Peter began sinking in the Sea of Galilee, it was not because God’s plan or power had failed. Peter could have rationalized like so many modern Christians and say, “God didn't want me to walk on the water, and besides it’s impossible for anybody to do such a thing anyway.” Like our first parents we still tend to place the ultimate blame on God when we fail to follow His plan of holy living. The Spirit of God seemed to anticipate the struggle many would pass through in accepting the biblical assurances of total victory. The inspired writers were moved to use almost fanatical language in describing the possibilities for overcoming sin. You see it all over in the Bible. Expressions are utilized which actually boggle the mind. Instead of saying we may be saved, the Bible says we can be “saved to the uttermost” (Hebrews 7:25). Instead of saying we may conquer, it assures that we can be “more than conquerors” (Romans 8:37). Instead of being told that we can just triumph, we are told that we may “always triumph” (2 Corinthians 2:14). 

Instead of promising whatever we might ask to help us in our spiritual battles, the Bible says He will give us “exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think” (Ephesians 3:20). And the verse just prior to that one clearly guarantees that we may “be filled with all the fullness of God”….which is verse 19. Now many of these promises are too vast for our human minds to comprehend fully, but surely they are intended to impress us with the magnitude of God’s resources in our behalf right? I believe so.  If the language sounds exaggerated it is only because we are too weak in faith and too weak in the flesh to believe such purity and sanctification could ever be fulfilled in us. We tend to trust our feelings quicker than the Word of God. I mean it happens to all of us all the time. I will be the first to tell you that I’m by no means perfect and I know God still has a way to go with me yet as does he with all humans. Is it important to believe the promises exactly as they read? Because it is only through those promises that deliverance can be accomplished. “Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises, that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust” (2 Peter 1:4). Notice that it is “by these” that we escape the corruption of sin. What are “these”? The promises of God. The sequence of victory is plainly marked out in this text. By faith in the promise we become a partaker of the divine nature, and through the power of that new nature in us we are able to escape the corruption of sin. 

In other words, everything depends on the surrender and commitment of one’s self to the Spirit of Christ. “Without me,” Jesus said, “ye can do nothing” (John 15:5). Equally important is the inspired comment Paul says, “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me” (Philippians 4:13). That little expression “all things” is the key to victory for every one of us. It includes power over drugs, immorality, appetite, pride, and every act of sin that would rob us of eternal life. Every child of Adam needs two things desperately in my opinion….forgiveness for the past, and power for the future. Redemption includes both of them and the idea that full deliverance from the guilt of sin is included….but only partial deliverance from the power of sin, is a perversion of the gospel. 

Jesus did not come to save us from the consequences of sin only, but to save us from the sin itself. This is huge to grasp in terms of the big picture. Salvation is not a negative thing….He did not come just to take away something—our guilt—but to give us something….victory over sin!! For God to forgive us and leave us under the power of continued sin would make God an accomplice of sin. He not only counts us righteous through His horrible death at the cross, but He makes us righteous through His victorious life. Here is another example or really another angle to look at. 

Ok so in the book of Revelation it addressees to these seven churches. In each of the churches certain ones received high commendation and glorious promises of heavenly reward. The blessing was extended “to him that overcometh.” Those seven churches symbolize every period of the Christian church from the apostles to the end of time. If victory over sin is not possible then no soul will be saved from those centuries of time. So to deny the possibility of total victory over sin is to rob God of the glory of His mission. He came, the Bible says to destroy the works of the devil. Those works are the works of sin. If no one claimed His power to overcome sin completely, the devil’s accusation would be confirmed. The requirements of God would be exposed as too difficult to obey. Jesus stated that He had come “to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10). Here He stated that more than just people needed to be restored. “That which was lost” included a sinless character. His mission was to counteract and neutralize the entire program of sin introduced by Satan. Restoring the image of God in man is a very important part of the everlasting gospel. That work of the gospel must be done before Jesus comes back to take us home. 

The book of Revelation also identifies the crowning characteristic of the redeemed as obedience. “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus” (Revelation 14:12). “And the dragon was wroth with the woman and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ” (Revelation 12:17). “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city” (Revelation 22:14). How significant and how cool is it that man’s condition for remaining in Eden is also the condition for being restored to Eden….it’s freaking awesome!! Anyone who believes obedience is un-important should read again the dramatic story of Adam and Eve. I mean come on. A tiny physical act of sin led to all the tragedy of the past 6,000 years plus now, since earth has been in existence (how long the earth is according to the Bible is a whole other study :-). 

Anyway those who are restored to that lost paradise will have demonstrated that they can be trusted with eternal life. Through faithful obedience in the face of death, they will have proven Satan’s charges to be false. Their steadfast loyalty will be an eternal guarantee of the security of God’s restored dominion of the universe. What can we say then concerning those who look so lightly upon the good works of obedience?  They are victims of deception and are playing right into Satan’s deadly sin-trap. The most glorious experience of the truly converted is to break the pattern of self-indulgence and sin. Under the rule of the Spirit of God, fleshly habits may be conquered and expelled from the life…..this is also key to understand and believe. Through faith in the promises unbelievable power may be released into the life of one who is willing to give up the enjoyment of sin…..which is not an easy thing to do and depending where you’re at in your walk with Christ and the choices you make will determine what you are willing to give up. But just remember that time is short as we are living in the end times, so I wouldn't not take it seriously and wouldn't put it off. The heart of God longs for us to take Him at His word and to claim the power He has promised. It is the only road to real victory. But no one can experience victory who does not believe victory is possible. Just take the Bible for what it says. Don’t try to twist it to match the weaknesses and failures of your human experience.

Boy was this ever my downfall for years and years when reading and studying the Bible. Deliverance from God is yours for the believing and the asking.

So now consider this objection which is always brought against those who believe in total victory. I know I have been asked this question…..If you believe it is possible to live without sinning, are you able to say that your own life is free from sin? It should be pointed out that the objection is not relevant to the issue. If the Bible establishes a truth, it should be received on the grounds of its inspired authority and not on the basis of the person’s experience. If victory over all sin is possible through Christ, it is true, whether the preacher has claimed it or not claimed it. Further, the work of sanctification is a progressive, lifelong experience and can never be considered as finished in point of time. Even if one could be unconscious of any known sin, he could never boast of being sinless. In fact the person who is closest to perfection would surely be the least likely to recognize it. Because the nearer he gets to Jesus the more imperfect he will appear in his own eyes. The claim might also be made that the doctrine of victory over sin is highly idealistic and too theologically complicated to be practical for today. But nothing could be farther from the truth according to the Bible. 

There is not a habit or sin known to man that cannot be conquered through faith. The question is do you really believe that? How do we beat the devil? Well we don’t beat the devil because the devil is stronger than we are and always will be. Trying will never break the power of sin in a single instance because again we’re facing an enemy who will always be stronger than we are. What then is the answer to our weakness and defeat? First you need to understand that all of heaven’s gifts are available to us through the promises of the Bible, and we receive them by faith. 

Peter describes the “exceeding great and precious promises” and assures us that “by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4). Mighty power is stored within the promise to fulfill itself to all who claim it in faith. So few are willing to believe that the promised blessing becomes there’s the very moment they believe it. So then as humans why is it so hard for some to believe implicitly that God will do what He promises? As always I will give you more Bible texts to dig into. 

Ok so consider these verses and I think they make it clear as to what the answer is. First: “But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 15:57). Allow your mind to soak in the message of these words. Victory is a gift! We do not earn it by our efforts, or deserve it because of any supposed goodness. The only thing we need do is ask for it, and the victory will be given to us freely by Christ. He is the only one who has ever gained the victory over Satan, and if we ever possess the victory, it will have to come as a gift from God. So what is your miserable habit of sin? I know one of mine was throwing pens at cars driving home from work on the turn pike. I haven’t done that in almost two years now. We all have bad habits of sin to break in our lives. Some are slaves to appetite, to alcohol, to sex, to drugs, to money, or even tobacco. Others are struggling helplessly against impurity, anger, or worldliness. The Bible says you may have the victory as a gift through Jesus Christ. Do you believe He will give you that power if you ask Him?....this is another one of those key points to understand. How certain can you be that God will answer your prayer for victory immediately? 

Here is how sure you can be….just as sure as Christ’s words are true!(Matthew 7:11), “If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?” Is it a good thing when you ask for victory over tobacco, or any other fleshly or moral evil? Of course it is! And you don’t even have to ask if it is God’s will! He has already told us in the Bible that it is His will to destroy the works of sin and the devil. If we pray for more money or a better job we should always ask according to His will be done because maybe God will answer our prayers in other ways, ways we don't see or expect, or even want sometimes, but the victory over sin is promised to every one who asks in faith. Will God give the victory when we ask Him? Jesus said He was more willing to give this good thing than we are to feed our children when they are hungry. 

He is waiting to honor your faith and to “supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:19). These assurances are so open-ended and unlimited that our minds are staggered by it. Why have we been so reluctant to apply for the provisions of grace? Why is it so hard to believe that God means exactly what He says in the Bible? He will keep every promise he has ever made and will make in the future, and for all eternity.




The Secret Rapture....Will It Be Secret?

The secret rapture doctrine contradicts the words of Christ in Matthew chapter 13 when He said that the wheat and tares would grow together until the "end of the world" and then would be separated. According to the two-stage teaching of His coming, both groups would not grow together until the end of the world. The righteous would be separated from the wicked seven years before the end. And what about the promise of the resurrection? Christ said, concerning the righteous, "And I will raise him up at the last day" (John 6:40). No one denies that this means the last day of the world. Yet Paul declares that the saints are caught up to meet the Lord at the same time the dead in Christ are raised. He says, "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air" (1 Thessalonians 4:16, 17). 

Please keep in mind that Jesus called this resurrection the "last day." But how could it be the "last day" if this gathering of the saints takes place seven years before the end of the world? And how could the "last trump" sound if it really wasn't the very last moment of time?

Can you imagine the graves opening and the righteous rising and no one knowing that it had occurred? Consider this additional testimony of the Word of God from the Bible:

Revelation 6:16,17 - When the wicked see Christ come, they cry out to the rocks and mountains, "Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?"

Matthew 24:27 - "For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be."

1 Corinthians 15:52 - "For the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised."

Psalm 50:3 - "Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence."

Revelation 1:7 - "Every eye shall see him. "

Matthew 24:30 - "Then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory."

Matthew 24:31 - "He shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other." (This is clearly the time when Christ comes to gather His saints.)

To say that the second coming of Christ to gather His saints will be secret, in view of these clear texts of Scripture, and in the absence of any text that even hints at His coming being secret, is to deny the Bible as the Word of God.
In an attempt to uphold their contrived theory, the rapturists quote Matthew 24:40, 41 out of context. Notice this entire passage:
"But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left" (Matthew 24:37-41).

Jesus is clearly drawing a parallel between the second coming and the days of Noah. Those who entered the ark in Noah's day were saved, and those who refused to enter the ark were left outside. But what were they left for? For another chance? No, obviously they were left to be destroyed by the Flood. So, says Jesus, will it be when He comes at the end of the world. One will be taken to heaven with Jesus, and the other will be left for destruction. Verse 51 makes clear what will happen to those who are left: "And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Read Luke 17:26-37 for Luke's parallel account of these same words of Jesus. In verse 36, this statement is made: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left." Now notice verse 37 and the question the disciples asked: "And they answered and said unto him, Where, Lord?" They wanted to know where those who didn't go to heaven were going to be left. Notice Jesus' clear answer: "And he said unto them, Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together."

Take note how Jesus taught that the bodies of the wicked are going to be left on the ground for the eagles to consume. Scripture is too plain to be misunderstood. Only as we accept all that the Bible says can we be safe from such deceptive teachings that are confusing millions of sincere Christians today concerning this most glorious event of all ages, the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Now, I realize that the rapturists hang onto the texts that liken the Lord's coming to "a thief in the night." They assume that this must be a quiet, secret coming. But does it really mean that? Let's show that it definitely does not. Here is one of those texts in 2 Peter 3: 10: "The day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat." Obviously the "thief' part has nothing to do with secrecy because the heavens will pass away with a great noise! And if coming "as a thief' is the secret rapture which takes place seven years before the end of the world, how can the heavens and earth "pass away," as Peter describes it? The heavens and earth could not pass away seven years before the world ends - that is the end!

The fact is that Jesus Himself explained clearly just how a thief's coming could be related to His coming: "Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. But know this, that if the good man of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up" (Matthew 24:42, 43). There it is, so plain and simple! The thief would come unexpectedly when the owners were not looking for a thief. In the same way, His coming would take people by surprise. They would not be watching or looking for it. 

Will Christ Return in Two Phases?

The dispensationalists teach that the two separate stages of Christ's coming are indicated "in the Greek." They argue that there will first be the rapture (parousia), a secret coming; then seven years later will be the revelation (apokalupsis), His coming in power and glory. But, actually, instead of teaching two separate events, the Greek terms are used interchangeably in the Bible. They give no indication of a seven-year interval.

For example, Paul uses the word "parousia" in the famous rapture chapter of 1 Thessalonians 4 in speaking of the coming of our Lord and our gathering together unto Him. He then goes right on to show that this "parousia" will destroy the man of sin. Speaking of the Antichrist, Paul says, "whom the Lord shall ... destroy with the brightness of his coming [parousia]" (2 Thessalonians 2:8). These texts clearly describe the coming (parousia) of Christ as taking place after the reign of the man of sin, not as an escape rapture before the reign of the Antichrist begins.

The other Greek word "apokalupsis" (revelation) is used in a way that indicates it is not a separate coming from the time the believers are gathered up. Peter said to "be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation [apokalupsis] of Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 1:13). Why would Christians be exhorted to keep hoping to the very end of the world for the grace brought through the revelation of Christ if their real hope was a secret rapture seven years before the revelation?

Now look at some verses that prove beyond a doubt that the two words "parousia" and "apokalupsis" refer to the same event. In Matthew 24:37 we read, "But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming [parousia] of the Son of man be." Luke's account of the same passage says "As it was in the days of Noah ... Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed [apokalupsis]" (Luke 17:26, 30). This shows that the coming (parousia) of Christ and the revelation (apokalupsis) of Christ are the same event. There is absolutely no basis for placing seven years in between.

Many dispensationalist teachers actually claim that the rapture is not really the "coming" of Jesus at all. They say His coming is when Christ returns in power seven years after the rapture. But what a contradictory, confusing explanation that is! The fact is that there are many Scriptures that admonish Christians to wait and watch for the coming of the Lord. For example, James 5:7 says, "Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Lord." But why should Christians need to be patient unto the coming of the Lord if there is to be a secret rapture to take them to heaven seven years before His coming?

Strange as it may seem, this whole counterfeit secret rapture is built upon a constant repetition of words and ideas that are not found in the Bible at all. But they have been repeated so often that millions have assumed that they must be soundly biblical. Let's take a look at some of the texts that have been used to support the doctrine of a two-phase coming of Christ. And please notice that none of the verses actually say what some try to read into them. In fact, it is only after a person has already assumed that Christ will return in two separate comings that these verses could even suggest the idea.

Revelation 3:10 is often quoted to try to prove that the righteous will be taken out of the world before the tribulation. "Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth." It is immediately obvious that this text does not speak of the righteous leaving this world at all. Jesus completely clarified the meaning by something He said in John 17:6, 15 which sounds very similar. "They have kept thy word. O I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil." Don't miss the significance of the term "kept the word" in both these texts. Both statements are talking about the same group of people - the faithful ones.

Now if those who "kept the word" can be "kept from the evil" of the world without being taken out of the world, why should we suppose that a special coming and secret rapture is required for those who "kept the word" to be "kept from the hour of temptation"? Whatever else may be taught in Revelation 3: 10, it is evident that no extra coming of Christ is indicated.

True biblical doctrine must be based upon clear statements of what the entire Bible teaches on a subject and not upon verses that offer only veiled inferences. Luke 21:36 is an example of that very thing. Jesus said to His disciples, "Pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass." How? By a secret rapture to take them to heaven seven years before the end of the world? Definitely not, for in the prayer of Jesus we read, "I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil." When He told them to "pray ... to escape," He must have meant the same as when He prayed, "I pray not ... take them out of the world but ... keep them." This rules out a secret rapture entirely. The text that is used to prove the rapture is seen actually to forbid the saints being taken out of this world during the time of trouble. 


The Seven-Year Tribulation

Since so much rapturist theology revolves around the seven-year period, one would assume that the Bible must speak frequently of such a time period. But not so. There is not one single scriptural reference that ties the seven years to the end of the world or the coming of Christ. Most rapturist literature mentions the seven-year tribulation period without offering any Bible proof or explanation. Millions have assumed that it must be so well documented that no proof is needed. In fact, the opposite is true. There just isn't any evidence to give.

Most Bible students are amazed to learn that the rapturists try to justify their seven years by lifting a prophecy of Daniel completely out of its context. In Daniel 9:24-27 God made a daring prophecy concerning the probation of the nation of Israel. He said to Daniel, "Seventy weeks ['weeks of years' RSV] are determined upon thy people ... to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins" (v. 24). Please notice that God was going to allow Daniel's people seventy weeks to see what they would do with the Messiah when He appeared. The seventy weeks are prophetic time, and each day represents a literal year (Ezekiel 4:6). So the seventy weeks would be a literal period of 490 years, after which the Israelites would no longer be God's people. They would be rejected as a nation because of their rejection of the Messiah.

Don't miss the point in Daniel 9:25 that the prophecy of the seventy weeks was to begin with the decree to restore and build Jerusalem. That well-known date is 457 B.C., when Artaxerxes sent out the decree from that date, 457 B.C., the Jews would have exactly 490 years to finish filling up their cup of iniquity by rejecting the Messiah. That 490-year probation ended in A.D. 34, and the Jews ceased to be God's chosen people. Daniel 9:25 says that the Messiah would be anointed after sixty-nine of those prophetic weeks had passed by. That would be 483 years from the decree date of 457 B.C. It takes no mathematician to figure the end of that prediction. It brings us to the year A.D. 27, the very year that Jesus was baptized by John and the Holy Spirit anointed Him for His ministry. Since "Messiah" means" Anointed One," this had to be the fulfillment of Daniel's prophecy that the Messiah would appear in A.D 27.

Now mark this fact: seventy weeks were assigned to the Jewish probation, but Christ appeared as the Messiah after sixty-nine weeks. That leaves the seventieth week for Christ to minister before the Jews' probation ended. What was to happen in the seventieth week? Daniel 9:27 tells us, "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease."

The midst of the week would be three and a half prophetic days (literal years) from His baptism. And according to the Bible, the ministry of Jesus lasted for three and a half years. In the spring of A.D. 31 He was crucified. The veil of the temple was rent (Matthew 27:51), signifying the end of sacrifices. By His death He caused them to cease. Another three and a half years would lead up to the end of the seventy weeks and the end of Jewish probation. During that three and a half years the disciples labored largely for the Jews. But in A.D. 34 the seventy weeks ended; Stephen was stoned and the gospel began to go to the Gentiles (Acts 8:4). The Jews had rejected the gospel message and were no longer God's people - just as Daniel had predicted. Henceforth they could be saved only as individuals, in exactly the same way as the Gentiles. As a nation, they had been rejected as the chosen people. Here is the way the Bible describes that rejection below: 

Matthew21:43 - "The kingdom of God shall be taken from you."

Matthew 21:19 - "And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward forever. And presently the fig tree withered away." (The fig tree was a symbol of the Jewish nation.)

Matthew 23:38 - "Behold, your house is left unto you desolate."

Galatians 3:28 - "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

Galatians 3:29 - "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise."

Romans 10:12 - "For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him."

Romans 9:6-8 - "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children; but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are ... the children of the promise are counted for the seed." (The New Testament teaches the acceptance of spiritual Israel, and the rejection of physical Israel and the children of the flesh.)

Romans 2:28, 29 - "For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter."

Acts 13:46 - "It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles."

The rapturists get their seven years' tribulation by lifting that seventieth week of Daniel's prophecy completely out of its context and shoving it far into the future. They claim it will be fulfilled after Christ comes to snatch away the righteous secretly. Incredible? Absolutely! But they must grasp desperately for some text to support their seven years. They agree that the sixty-nine weeks of Daniel 9:25 refer to the period before Christ's first advent, but then they insert a 2,000-year gap before the seventieth week is fulfilled. They allot 69 weeks plus 2,000 years plus one week, or a total of 2,490 years. By this devious manipulation of God's Word, the rapturists believe they have extended the Jewish probation; and based upon this, they teach that all the fleshly Jews will be saved in a great second chance after the "secret rapture" takes place.

The tragedy of the rapture theory is that it takes these beautiful verses of Daniel 9:24-27 that predict the coming of Jesus, His baptism and crucifixion, and apply them to Antichrist. They do this by stating that it is Antichrist that causes the sacrifice and oblation to cease after three and one-half years. But Daniel states that it is Jesus who caused the sacrificial system of the Jews to cease when He died on the cross. A misinterpretation that confuses something Christ has done, and applies it to the devil instead, is certainly a tragic occurrence. And yet this is the only way one can arrive at a seven-year tribulation period. How sad L

When Does the Antichrist Appear?

Now we are brought to focus on the most glaring inconsistency of the rapture theory, and that is that the Antichrist will not appear until after the saints are caught away - seven years before the end of the world. Paul settles the entire matter for us in the first few verses of 2 Thessalonians chapter 2. "Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day [of our gathering together unto Him] shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin [Antichrist] be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God" (vs. 1-4).

The words of Paul are so plain that it is difficult to comment on them. How can they be plainer? Christ's coming will not take place "except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed." Show these words to any child who has learned to read; show them to anyone not prejudiced by "private" interpretations, and he will say, "These verses say that the man of sin (Antichrist) is going to be revealed before Jesus comes."

Paul is not referring to some superman suddenly to appear 2,000 years after his epistles. He wrote, "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work" (v. 7). While Paul lived, he combated the emerging spirit of the Antichrist. By the sixth century A.D., Antichrist had matured. The crowning act in the great drama of deception, however, occurs just before the return of Christ: "And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming."' Verse 8. This clearly states that Antichrist will be destroyed when Christ comes. He does not arrive after the Second Advent. And here's the crowning clarification in this whole thing. Revelation 20:4 assures us that some of those who are raised in the first resurrection will be those who refused to worship the beast and receive his mark! How completely this demolishes the futuristic school of prophetic interpretation is evident, for they claim that the emergence of the Antichrist and the imposition of his mark are to be looked for after the first resurrection and what they call the secret rapture. Recently a radio preacher expressed this belief: "I don't expect to be here when the beast is enforcing his mark upon the people. I expect to go up in the rapture and be in heaven during the great tribulation time." But these verses declare that some of those who come up in the "first resurrection," when Christ comes the second time, have already refused to worship the Antichrist or receive his mark! Thus, the Antichrist must have already been on the stage of action carrying on his oppressive work before the "first resurrection" and well before the second coming of Jesus.

Without attempting to establish the identity of Antichrist at this point, let us notice how this teaching - that the Antichrist will come in the future - originated. At the time of the Reformation, most of the reformers understood the prophecy of the Antichrist to refer to the great apostate system of Romanism that developed during the Middle Ages. Of course, Rome did not appreciate this interpretation. Please notice Rome's course of action to nullify this interpretation: 

"So great a hold did the conviction that the Papacy was the Antichrist gain upon the minds of men, that Rome at last saw she must bestir herself, and try, by putting forth other systems of interpretation, to
counteract the identification of the Papacy with the Antichrist”. "Accordingly, toward the close of the century of the Reformation, two of the most learned doctors set themselves to the task, each endeavoring by different means to accomplish the same end, namely, that of diverting men's minds from perceiving the fulfillment of the prophecies of the Antichrist in the papal system. The Jesuit Alcazar devoted himself to bring into prominence the preterist method of interpretation, ... and thus endeavored to show that the prophecies of Antichrist were fulfilled before the popes ever ruled in Rome, and therefore could not apply to the Papacy”."On the other hand, the Jesuit Ribera tried to set aside the application of these prophecies to the papal power by bringing out the futurist system, which asserts that these prophecies refer properly, not to the career of the Papacy, but to some future supernatural individual, who is yet to appear, and continue in power for three and a half years. Thus, as Alford says, the Jesuit Ribera, about A.D. 1580, may be regarded as the founder of the futurist system of modern times”. "It is a matter for deep regret that those who advocate the futurist system at the present day, Protestants as they are for the most part, are really playing into the hands of Rome, and helping to screen the Papacy from detection as the Antichrist.

Thus, the whole theory of the secret rapture with its future Antichrist had its origin with the Jesuits in an attempt to take the blame off the Papacy.

The origin of the two-phase coming of Christ has an equally unsavory history. It was not until around the year 1830 that this view began to be taught. In the Scottish church pastored by Edward Irving, a Miss Margaret McDonald gave what was believed at the time to be an inspired utterance. She spoke of the visible, open, and glorious second coming of Christ. But as the utterance continued, she spoke of another coming of Christ - a secret and special coming in which those who were truly ready would be raptured.

However, it was John Nelson Darby - Brethren preacher and diligent writer of the time in England - who was largely responsible for introducing this new teaching on a large scale. The teaching spread to the United States in the 1850s and 1860s, where it was to receive its biggest boost when Cyrus Ingerson Scofield, a strong believer in Darby's teachings, incorporated it into the notes of his Scofield Reference Bible, which was published in 1909. Since that time, this view has been widely accepted - often by people who are completely unaware that this was not the belief held by Christians over the centuries. Many fine Christians hold his view today who have never questioned its authority.

Oswald Smith, noted minister and author of Toronto, says in his booklet Tribulation or Rapture - Which? that he once held the two-stage teaching, but that when he began to search the Scriptures for himself, he discovered that there is not a single verse in the Bible to uphold this view. He confessed: "I had been taught that the Greek word 'parousia' always referred to the Rapture and that other words were used for the coming of Christ in glory ... but I found that this is not true. ... We might go through all the writers of the New Testament, and we would fail to discover any indication of the so-called 'two stages' of our Lord's coming ... That theory had to be invented by man. Search and see. There is no verse in the Bible that even mentions it."

The Second Chance


Finally, the secret rapturists claim that during the tribulation those not raptured will be given another chance to be saved. Let it be categorically stated that nowhere does Scripture speak of a second chance, nor does the Bible anywhere speak of people being saved after Jesus comes. This is just another manmade doctrine that is indeed pleasing to the carnal heart of man. Actually, the Bible teaches the opposite. Notice these clear texts of Scripture below:

2 Corinthians 6:2 - "Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation."

Revelation 22:11, 12 -  "He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still. And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me." (Evidently probation closes just prior to the Second Advent.)

Jeremiah 8:20 - "The harvest (day of second coming) is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved."

When Jesus comes the second time, He carries "in his hand a sharp sickle" (Revelation 14:14). This is the reaping time after sixty centuries of the sowing of the seeds of sin. This is the harvest time, and "the harvest is the end of the world" (Matthew 13:39). "And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth was reaped" (Revelation 14:16). Truly did Jeremiah say, "The harvest is past ... and we are not saved" (Jeremiah 8:20). There can be no saving after the reaping of earth's harvest at the coming of Christ.

When Jesus and His holy angels appear, then "before him shall be gathered all nations" (Matthew 25:32). There will only be two classes in that great company. The destiny of each has been set by what he did before the coming of Christ.

Let us stand firm on the Word of God alone and reject these man made, man pleasing ideas that form the bulk of the whole secret rapture theory. As we have noticed, the Bible clearly teaches that Jesus Christ will come the second time in glorious majesty to take His redeemed home with Him. It will be a personal, visible, and earthshaking event that everyone alive will know about. The righteous will be caught up to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thessalonians 4: 17), whereas the wicked will be slain by the brightness of that coming (2 Thessalonians 2:8). Let us carefully study our Bibles that we will not be deceived concerning this most important and wonderful hope, the second coming of Yshua. 

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Understanding Muslim beliefs and Radical Islam (ISIS)

I think we have to understand this evil group (enemy if you wish to call them) and what they believe in. Islam or the radical Muslim religion (ISIS) is growing. Remember I personally believe there are good people in every part of the world and not all Muslims are like radical Islam...most hate what ISIS is doing around the world right now. You have to separate all Muslims from ISIS...but most of their core beliefs are the same. They believe in total obedience to the one God Allah...there God of the Bible. Islam comes from a root word meaning surrender or submitting oneself to God, renouncing any other object of worship. They believe in five primary religious duties of Islam which are....

1. To pronounce Shahada or "there is no God but Allah", and that Mohammed is the apostle of God.
2. There ritual prayer of Salat performed five times a day...dawn, noon, afternoon, sundown, and evening and facing Mohammeds birthplace while doing it which is called Mecca.
3. giving a fixed percentage tax levied by Muslim governments upon the faithful.
4. A fast during the month of Ramadan.
5. Haji or a pilgrimage to Mecca at least once during your lifetime here on earth.

Remember that Muslims accept the Koran as the complete verbatim direct speech or language of God, which is Allah. They even trace their roots and origin to Abraham whom they believe offered up Ishmael as the child of promise rather then Isaac. Tracing their lineage through Abraham, Moses, and even John the Baptist. They believe that Jesus simply was a prophet.

However, Islam is closer to Judaism and Christianity than any of the other great world religions. The Muslims claim Judaism is failed and that Christianity is spiritually corrupt. Therefore God raised up the prophet Mohammed to reform the corruptions of an apostate religion(s).

Some Christian beliefs held in common with Muslims:
1. Muslims believe in an almighty, all knowing and loving God.
2. They accept that all humans are morally responsible for their actions.
3. They believe in a final resurrection from the dead at the Messiah's return.
4. They give great emphasis to assisting and helping the poor
5. Muslims place priority on prayer
6. Muslims forbid alcohol, gambling, and pork.
7. Place emphasis on obedience to God
8. Muslims believe in a great controversy between good and evil.

Some Muslim beliefs contrary to Biblical thought....they still disagree with. I list some Bible verses under each question that if you read will say that the Bible is true. You can also match up the Bible with history to prove that the Bible is true as well if you do your homework.

1. Muslims believe that Jesus is/was just a prophet but not the eternal Son of God.
(see John 8:58 and compare with Ex. 3:14, also read Heb. 1:6-8, Mic. 5:2, Isa. 9:6.)

2. Muslims believe that The Bible is not really reliable since it is filled with human error and has not been copied accurately.
(see 2 Tim. 3:16, 2 Peter. 1:21,  Pslams 12:6,7,  Matt. 24:35, Pslams. 119: 105)

3. Salvation is attained by following the Five religious duties of Islam.
(see Rom. 3:23,  Isa. 59:1, 2, Rom 6:23, Eph. 2:8, Heb. 2:8,9,  2 Cor. 5:21, Gal 3:13)

4. Revelations through Mohammed Supersede the Bible and Mohammed provides a source of salvation.
(see John 17:17, and 14:6, Acts 4:12, and Isa 45:22).

Video Link of ISIS:

Speaking In Tongues



First read all of 1 Corinthians 14: 1-40 talking about tongues.

One of the gifts of the spirit is the gift of tongues. However the proof of the filling of the Spirit is not the gifts of the Spirit, but Jesus said you will know them by the fruits of the spirit. So to say that a person has the holy spirit or has the evidence of the holy spirit because of tongues is false. There are only 3 examples in the book of Acts speaking with tongues and many examples in the Bible of people being filled with the Holy Spirit.

When it comes to tongues being used in the Bible, God gives people the supernatural ability to speak languages of the world that they had not formerly known……for the purpose of spreading the Gospel.  That’s what happens in all three examples of tongues that you find in the only 3 examples in the whole Bible in the book of Acts.  Acts Chapter 2, Acts Chapter 10, and Acts Chapter 19.  Those are the only examples of tongues in the whole Bible like I said.  Paul only mentions tongues in one part of one book, even though he wrote 14 books of the New Testament.  Matthew never mentions it.  Mark mentions it one time where Jesus says you will speak with other tongues.  Luke never mentions it in his Gospel, though he does in Acts of course.  John never mentions it at all in any of his writings, neither does Peter. It isn’t mentioned at all in the Old Testament of the Bible.  So churches that make tongues their gospel I believe that’s not Biblical. There are a lot of counterfeit examples of tongues going on out there to look out for. Paul says one word of God is worth a thousand of mine in 1st Corinthians chapter 14. Paul is dealing specifically here with a church that was making tongues the priority and neglecting the real gift, which was Prophecy.  That’s why he says in 1st Corinthians 14 verse 1, “Pursue love and desire Spiritual gifts, but especially that you might prophecy”. Now he contrasts Prophecy – the greatest gift – Prophecy doesn’t just mean foretelling the future, it means preaching with tongues because he says in the next verse, in verse 2 “For he who speaks in a tongue doesn’t speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however in the spirit he speaks mysteries”.  Then read verse 3 and 4….see what Paul is saying? Then he says to seek those gifts that build up the church in verse 5, that the church might receive edification.  Well then he tells us edification comes from prophecy, which you read in verse 12. So from the preaching…so he says all through the book that the real emphasis ought to be on speaking so people understand the Gospel.


Remember it doesn’t make you any more a Christian to speak in tongues. Remember the Bible does not say that we are known by the gifts of the Spirit.  Jesus said you’ll know them by there fruit.  The fruit of the Spirit is not tongues. Today in 2014 tons of people try to make it seem like the proof you have the Spirit is tongues, and it’s not true. It’s just not true if you follow the Bible. Remember the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peac, ect ect…… Tongues are not even in the list! So people who get that mixed up their doctrine is flawed. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 14:19, “Yet in the church I’d rather speak five words with my understanding, that I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue”. Meaning why speak in a way nobody can understand? It doesn’t help at all. So Paul is saying when you speak make sure others can understand. When people are translating as those up front were speaking…That’s the gift of tongues.  But for people who all speak English and understand each other, and one of them decides to start babbling and let someone else translate, why would God use that technique? The Lord never did that or used that technique with the Apostles at all